Was Paul a Deceiver?

The popular myth that Paul was deceptive is expressed by writers such as Gerald Sigal, Michoel Drazin, and Beth Moshe:

In his overriding desire to convert the masses to his beliefs, Paul is guided by the dubious assumption that the end justifies the means...The use of deception, by himself or others, in order to bring about belief in Jesus did not disturb Paul.

Gerald Sigal, The Jew and the Christian Missionary: A Jewish Response to Missionary Christianity (New York: Ktav, 1981), p. 272. See also p. 290: "he considered deceit and pretense valid means for achieving his goal.

[Paul] openly advocated 'pious fraud.'

Michoel Drazin, Their Hollow Inheritance: A Comprehensive Refutation of the New Testament and Its Missionaries (Jerusalem: Gefen Publishing House, 1990), p. 18.

"We feel we should demonstrate the unreliability of the man who actually formulated the break away from Judaism by the early Church...Now see who he is, by his own words. He admitted using trickery and deception to gain his ends."

Beth Moshe, Judaism's Truth Answers the Missionaries (New York: Bloch Publishing Company, 1987), p. 212.

The New Testament passage in question that supposedly reveals Paul as a deceiver is First Corinthians 9:20-22:

To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some.

Far from being deceptive, Paul, when he wrote the passage from First Corinthians, was drawing on Jewish communications methods of his day. Like other Jewish leaders, Paul was simply being a good teacher and communicator. What Paul sets forth in First Corinthians is not a principle of deceit and expediency, but a principle of communication such as was taught and practiced by Hillel and others. Craig Keener, Professor of New Testament, Hood Theological Seminary, places First Corinthians 9:20-22 firmly within a Jewish context.

Some Jewish teachers, like Hillel, were similarly accommodationists, to win as many as possible to the truth.

The IVP Bible Background Commentary (Downers Grove IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), p. 472.

Similarly, David Daube, a Jewish Professor of Law at University of California, Berkeley, wrote at length about Paul's principles as found in First Corinthians 9:20-22. The following is taken from a much longer chapter, "Missionary Maxims in Paul," which is found in Daube's book The New Testament and Rabbinic Judaism:

[This idea is] taken over by Paul from Jewish teaching on the subject: the idea that you must adopt the customs and mood of the person you wish to win over....

First, for the idea of accommodation. Let us start from a passage in I Corinthians [Daube quotes First Corinthians 9:20-22].

This attitude had formed part of Jewish missionary practice long before Paul. Two Talmudic illustrations of Hillel's work are relevant: he accepted into the fold a gentile who refused to acknowledge the oral Law, and he accepted another who refused to acknowledge any Law beyond the most fundamental ethical principle [b. Shabbat 31a and Avot de-Rabbi Nathan 15]...At the decisive moment of conversion, he fell in with the notions of the applicant and declared himself satisfied with recognition of the written Law or a single, basic moral precept....

Hillel, we might put it, was made all things to all men, that he might by all means save some.

[Hillel had a saying] which may chiefly contemplate relations to outsiders [Tosefta Berachot 2.24]: "Do not appear naked, do not appear dressed, do not appear laughing, do not appear weeping -- as it is said, A time to weep and a time to laugh, a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing [Ecclesiastes 3:4f.]....

In the treatises Derekh Eretz Rabba and Derekh Eretz Zuta, we meet with descendants of Hillel's maxim. The former contains this paragraph: "A man should not be joyful among the weeping, nor weep among the joyful, nor wake among the sleeping, nor sleep among the waking, nor stand among the sitting, nor sit among the standing--the principle of the matter is, A man should not make different his mind from that of his fellows and the sons of men." The passage from Derekh Eretz Zuta is substantially the same, with two exceptions: there is a further pair of warnings, "nor should he read Scripture among those reading Mishnah, nor Mishnah among those reading Scripture," while the summing up runs, "A man should not differ from the usage of the creatures."

These paragraphs are evidence that Hillel's idea was taken up by others and lived on....

[It is] rather probable that Hillel did intend his maxim [cited above from Tosefta Berachot 2:24], which refers to behaviour among strangers, for use in missionary activity.

For another thing, in establishing the Jewish antecedents of Paul's plan, we need not rely exclusively on Hillel and sayings derived from him. In the Letter of Aristeas, the king asks how he might meet with acceptance when travelling abroad; and the answer opens, "By becoming equal to all," pasin isos ginomenos. As it stands, it is advice for a traveller -- a traveller who wishes to find favour with his hosts. Moreover, the term "equal" has a political sense: the traveller is a king, and he is advised to make light of his rank. None the less it may be assumed that, as early as the time the Letter was composed, this was also a slogan of proselyte-makers. The author of the Letter himself was a Jewish propagandist.

Paul, when he wrote the passage from I Corinthians quoted at the beginning, was drawing on a living element in Jewish religion.

David Daube, The New Testament and Rabbinic Judaism (Salem, NH: Ayer Company, Publishers, Inc., 1992, © 1956, 1973), pp. 336-41 passim.

Add comment

  • If your comment does not pertain to this specific article/blog please click here to send us a message. Comments not related to this article will not be posted.
  • We reserve the right to delete vulgar, racist, or hateful content, as well as inappropriate and off-topic posts.
  • Comments including links will not be published.
  • Multiple comments posted in a row will not be accepted.
  • Comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.




Is not paul simply meeting people at a level that they can understand and relate to? Did not our forefather Abram tell his wife Sarai to say to that she was his sister to save himself decieving the Egyptians to win favour? Genisis 12:v12-14


I believe Paul/Saul to be a deceiver. We do not see confirmation in 3s in his vision account of meeting Jesus on the road to Damascus. Also, God JEHOVAH did not accompany this Jesus when meeting Paul. Jesus never blinded anyone. He healed the blind. Paul/Saul was not a Disciple with Jesus from baptism to resurrection/ascensi on, so wouldn't have known this. Peter on the other hand received confirmation in 3s many times. Peter had a vision of a sheet of animals lowered down and lifted up 3 times. "Rise Peter, Kill and Eat". Peter was ordained minister to the Gentiles. Paul mixes in Grace with Legalism together. As soon as God's Word is sown, the devil comes to deceive. Yeast mixed in with the Dough. Tares mixed in with the Wheat. But Jesus' sheep hear his voice. Jesus is a snake on a pole. Those who look to the snake on the pole, those who handle the snake(his body; bread), those who drink his poison(blood), will not die, but live. Mark had it right.

Johnathain Banks

Paul is Not a Deciever. Look, at 2 Peter 3:15-17Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)

15 And think of our Lord’s patience as deliverance, just as our dear brother Sha’ul also wrote you, following the wisdom God gave him. 16 Indeed, he speaks about these things in all his letters. They contain some things that are hard to understand, things which the uninstructed and unstable distort, to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.

17 But you, dear friends, since you know this in advance, guard yourselves; so that you will not be led away by the errors of the wicked and fall from your own secure position.


Paul says that spies have infiltrated Christianity. What is the old saying? 4 more months until the harvest.
I can hear Jesus saying, You have a saying, the guilty dog barks first.
Paul that's you. also...
If you can't beat'em, join'em.
Infiltrate and undermine.
Oh, Paul actually did beat himself.
Beat himself into subjection to the "Will of God"
Paul did anyone ever tell you the story of the

Jo Ellen

Eric, I do not believe that Jesus struck Paul blind. I believe that Paul's condition , living in darkness and believing that all Christians were heretics, is what caused Saul's blindness. Jesus himself would have refuted the idea that he struck Saul blind. Remember when Jesus was accused of being of the devil because he was healing the sick? Jesus's answer is found in Mark 3:22-30. A house divided will not be able to stand.
I would never tell anyone that God/Jesus made anyone blind/sick.
Also, following Paul's conversion, app. 17 yrs. Paul went to Jersulem and received the right hand of fellowship from the Christian leadership. Including Peter. Acts 15 shows us that the diciples themselves blessed Paul and Barnabas's teachings. If I thought that all of the disciples were deceived I would lose heart.
Want to chat with a Jew for Jesus? Volunteers are available to answer your questions.
Chat Now